                                           |
|



|
Autor:
|
Sven Kjaer, Elsam Engineering
A/S (former ELSAMPROJEKT A/S)
|
| Tytuł: |
Advanced
Super Critical Power Plant;
Experiences of ELSAMPROJEKT |
Abstract
Danish power companies now operate six supercritical (SC) and two
ultra supercritical (USC) pulverised coal-fired (PF) power plants
featuring 250-400 MWe, this paper be present some of the most
interesting operating experiences with these plants. Supercritical
steam conditions are primarily attached to lower electricity costs
through improved fuel economy, and with a modest increase in
investments and high availability a sound economy of the concept is
guaranteed. Sea water cooling further improves net efficiencies up to
45%.
Since the first SC plants were commissioned high temperature steel
has improved remarkably. The P91 steel has been used for headers, steam
piping, casings and rotors, which allow for operation at USC steam
conditions (290 bar/580°C) and further improvements of
efficiency.
However, better steels are already available and a steel named P92 has
now been bought for the next Danish power project.
However, steel cannot continue to improve forever and crossing the
"steel barrier" will need nickel-based "Super Alloys" for the hottest
areas of the water steam cycle. A demonstration programme on this issue
was launched in 1998 by a group of 40 European utilities, research
laboratories and equipment manufacturers with economic support from the
European Commission's THERMIE program. Commissioning of the advanced
plant is foreseen for 2010 and maximum steam temperatures will be in
the range of 700-720°C and net efficiences 52-55%, depending on
site
and fuel conditions. An important part of the project is also to
demonstrate ways of lowering investment costs.
1 Introduction
Since the energy crisis in 1973 and 1979 a lot of effort has been
made to reduce the energy consumption in Denmark and increase the use
of indigenous fuels and renewables. In recent years also the need of
reduced CO2 emission from power generation has been a prime driver in
Danish energy policy. However, experience from the introduction of new
technologies for power generation has shown that in particular
renewables are difficult to introduce in Denmark where the major
sources are wind and straw.
Table 1 gives an indication of how power was generated in the ELSAM
area in 1996 and 1997. It is seen that the major part of the
electricity production is still coal based but its share of the total
electricity generation is highly dependent on export of electricity.
Comparison of the figures for 1996 and 1997 of Table 1 offer an
excellent demonstration of the volatility of the open markets for power
generation and the need for operational elasticity of the fossil fueled
installations.
Renewables like wind contributes with some 5% of total generation.
The target of the government to burn 1.2 m tonnes of straw by the
utilities has now been delayed by four years from Year 2000 to 2004.
Combined heat and power production has found widespread application
and a large number of small de-centralised and mainly gas-fired
cogeneration installations are now working with a share of some 20% of
total generation.
| |
Capacity in MW
|
Production in TWh
|
|
Year
|
1996
|
1997
|
1996
|
1997
|
|
Primary Stations
|
3910
|
4310
|
22.8
|
17.6
|
|
Distributed Generation
|
1190
|
1290
|
5
|
5.5
|
|
Wind Power
|
600
|
870
|
1
|
1.5
|
|
Hydro (from Norway)
|
600
|
600
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total
|
6300
|
7070
|
28.8
|
24.8
|
Table 1. ELSAM. Generating
Capacity and Electricity Production in 1996.
All coal-fired power plants
commissioned in the 1980s and 1990s
have been designed for super critical operation with high efficiency
ratings. Before the introduction of the super critical power plant
concept, the generally applied concept was a drum-type boiler, which
was replaced by the once-through type boiler to increase efficiency by
at least 3% (relative) for practically the same investment.
It is the experience of ELSAMPROJEKT that the positive Danish
experiences concerning the economy of the super critical technology
concept versus drum boiler technology has now been reckognized world
wide and the number of super critical power plants is increasing. In
Europe all new power plant and projects are based on super critical
stream parameters.
However, there will still be a number of power projects - typically
with small outputs below some 300 MW - based on drum boilers because
the local manufacturers in the newly industrialised parts of the world
can build these boilers easily due to their simple design and at low
costs.
The first Danish super critical power plant started operation in
1984 at the Studstrup power station and today a total of eight super
critical units are in operation whereof six belong to the ELSAM power
generators. Main design parameters for the six coal-fired ELSAM plants
are shown in table 2.
Steam parameters of the first four super critical units are rather
conventional and well proven but during the 1989 VGB Congress "Power
Stations 1989" in Hamburg, ELSAM presented their ideas of new
generating capacity based on further improvements of conventional super
critical PF technology. These ideas have now been realised in the new
units with USC steam parameters at the Skaerbaek and Nordjylland power
stations and please note that unit 3 at Skaerbaekvaerket is a gas-fired
twin unit of unit 3 at Nordjyllandsvaerket.
|
Unit
|
Dim.
|
Studstrup 3/4
|
Fyn 7
|
Esbjerg 3
|
Skaerbaek 3
|
Nordjylland 3
|
|
Gross output
|
MW
|
375
|
420
|
415
|
413
|
411
|
|
Main steam pressure
|
bar
|
250
|
250
|
250
|
290
|
290
|
|
Main steam temp.
|
°C
|
540
|
540
|
560
|
582
|
582
|
|
Reheat temperature
|
°C
|
540
|
540
|
560
|
580/580
|
580/580
|
|
Feedwater temp.
|
°C
|
260
|
280
|
275
|
300
|
300
|
|
Condenser pressure
|
mbar
|
27
|
27
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
|
Net efficiency
|
%
|
42
|
43.5
|
45
|
49
|
47
|
|
Commissioning year
|
-
|
1984/85
|
1991
|
1992
|
1997
|
1998
|
Table 2. Thermodynamic Main
Parameters of Super Critical Plants in the ELSAM Area.
Basic to ELSAM's ideas was to use a new 9% Cr steel named P91 which
was emerging at that time. P 91 had 30% better creep strength than well
proven X20 CrMoV 121 and made it possible to design thick walled
sections like headers and rotors for steam temperatures in the range of
580 C. Further, despite advanced steam parameters, all international
regulations on operating behaviour and characteristics (start time,
gradients etc) can be met.
ELSAM's idea of improving the coal to wire conversion efficiency by
introducing better steel to improve the efficiency of conventional PF
technology and lower the electricity prices and CO2 is now accepted in
other areas of Europe. This is best illustrated by the new
lignite-fired 800-900 MW power plants owned by German VEAG which all
have introduced P91 to increase steam temperatures and improve net
efficiency.
Figure
1 indicates the development of steel for thick walled boiler sections
and steam piping which represent one of the bottlenecks for further
improvement of conventional coal-fired technology. It is seen that X20
CrMoV 121 was in use for a very long period of more than 30 years
before P 91 took over the predominating role. However, the leading role
of P 91 only lasted for 10 years before P 92 took over but further
improvements - named Super Alloys and to be mentioned later - after
another 10 years are also indicated in figure 1.
Figure 1.
Development of high temperature materials.
2 Experience with
Operation of Super Critical Power Plants.
The super critical plants have all been built according to the
"split package/multi contract principle" in which a project is divided
into several packages put out to tender individually. Applying this
principle has been very satisfactory, as it enables the owner to
utilise his experience from plants already in operation and combine the
experience of different suppliers.
The general experience with the operation of super critical plants
has been good: the time-based availabilities of the seven units are all
within the range of 90-94%. It is important to note that no impact on
availability has been observed due to the super critical steam
parameters and the time between planned overhauls has now been enhanced
from one to two years.
Information concerning the operation of unit 3 at Esbjergv rket, in
particular the no. of operating hours and net efficiency, is shown in
table 3 for the period 1994 to 1997. Also, table 3 demonstrates the
tendency to extend time intervals for planned overhauls from one to two
years. It may be concluuded that the figures show a very reliable
plant, featuring actual annual efficiencies in the range of 45%
corresponding to the design values.
|
|
Unit
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
|
Electric power to grid
|
GWh
|
2410
|
2647
|
2616
|
|
District heat production
|
TJ
|
4224
|
4386
|
4538
|
|
District heat converted to
elec. power
|
GWh
|
168
|
170
|
178
|
|
Equivalent full load hours
|
h
|
6838
|
7572
|
7411
|
|
Operation hours
|
h
|
7923
|
7595
|
8612
|
|
Planned overhaul
|
h
|
708
|
708
|
0
|
|
Forced outage rate
|
%
|
1.5
|
5.5
|
1.7
|
|
Electric efficiency, (LHV)
|
%
|
45.5
|
45
|
44.7
|
|
Fuel utilisation incl.
district heat
|
%
|
63.2
|
61.7
|
62
|
Table 3.
Operating data for Esbjerg Power Plant.
Operation of the boiler is the most troublesome part of plant
operation and some of the major problems will be addressed shortly. All
boilers have demonstrated good operating characteristics and the
guaranteed boiler efficiencies, in the range of 93-95% and more, have
not shown any tendency to decrease with boiler age. The most common
reason for forced outage time is still tube failures caused by fly ash
erosion.
The operating experience and behaviour of the economiser and water
walls has been good and no major problems have arisen. Despite the
higher water/steam temperatures in the water walls of super critical
boilers, tube failures have not occurred in these sections.
Super critical steam pressure has not increased the number of tube
failures in superheaters and reheaters and high temperature corrosion
has not been observed at Esbjerg 3 which was the first plant to operate
at steam temperatures above 540 C considered as the ultimate steam
temperature for many years.
Typical for super critical boilers with single reheat is the very
low temperature of the cold reheater, which increases the amount of
energy absorbed in the reheater compared to a subcritical unit. As
cooling of the big reheater bundles is crucial to a super critical
power plant in all modes of operation, a 100% HP bypass replaces the
safety valves on the high-pressure part of the boiler.
In one of the plants, the HP bypass valves started to vibrate
heavily at partial load and much effort was put into solving the
problem. Due to good co-operation with the valve manufacturer and a new
arrangement of the steam lines around the valves, the vibration problem
was eventually solved.
A relatively large share of ELSAMs coal is imported from Poland but
also from most other
major coal exporting countries world-wide. Blending of coals is only
used in extreme cases to overcome operating problems.
Coal is pulverised in vertical tube mills at Esbjerg Power Plant
and in roller mills at the rest of the plants. These tube mills have
exhibited very satisfactory operating behaviour with low maintenance
costs and are capable of operating for some 30,000 hours between
overhauls and it seems difficult for the roller mills to reach this
long time between overhauls. However, one of the shortcomings of the
tube mills is their high power consumption, up to twice as much as the
roller mills.
The fine milling also leads to slightly reduced tendency to
slagging and less fouling problems as all ash particles cool well
before entering the first superheaters. Typically, a tendency of
reduced soot blowing of the furnace walls is seen and the amount of
bottom slag is reduced, while more fly ash is being generated.
3. The Skaerbaek and Nordjylland Power Plants.
3.1 USC Water / Steam Cycle
In 1993 ELSAM started construction of two 400 MW twin units with
USC steam conditions. The design was based on new steel P 91 for
headers, steam piping and turbine, the water/steam cycle of the two
double reheat plants is shown in figure 2, which also indicates the low
condenser pressure due to seawater cooling and the 10 stage
regenerative heating of main condensate and feed water. A detailed
presentation of these plants were given during the VGB Conference
"Fossil-fired Power Plants with Advanced Design Parameters", in June
1993 in Kolding, Denmark.
The idea of double reheat is to lower generating cost and reduce
severe erosion of the last stage buckets in the LP turbines by water
droplets as seen in some of ELSAM's super critical units. The water
content in the exhaust steam of seawater cooled single reheat plants
may increase to 15% during winter time operation of single reheat
cycles and it will be reduced by some 5% through double reheat.
Figure 2.
USC Water/Steam Cycle (1997)
The steam turbines for both plants have been supplied by ALSTOM and
new 9-10% Cr steel has been foreseen for valve bodies, turbine casings
and rotors in direct contact with high steam temperatures. However,
also the cooling of the hottest sections by colder steam has been
foreseen to ensure the continuous use of older more proven steel. The
turbo set is split as follows:
- A single-flow very-high-pressure turbine, without
control stage.
- A combined high and intermediate pressure turbine of
asymmetric double-flow construction.
- A further IP turbine of asymmetric double-flow
construction which
allows for two steam extractions at very low steam pressures and a two
stage heating of the water circulating in the district heating system.
This design guarantees the optimum thermodynamical advantages of the
low temperatures of the circulating water of the district heating
systems.
- Two double-flow low-pressure turbines.
Both steam generators are identically designed by Danish Burmeister
& Wain Energi and built in a consortium with Aalborg Industries
A/S
and V lund Energy A/S. The different main fuels, of course, mean
differences in the combustion and flue gas systems. These differences,
however, are allowed for in such a way that conversion from gas to
coal-firing is possible without major modifications.
Figure 3 shows a schematic view of the super critical once-through
single-pass steam generator where the top of the boiler house is 90 m
above ground level. The furnace has spirally-wound furnace walls and
the cross-section is a square with a side length of 12.25 m. 16 low NOx
burners with staged combustion are arranged in the corners at four
levels and the main steam flow is controlled by sliding pressure
operation at fully open turbine valves.
All well-known ferritic and ferritic/martensitic steels are used
but the advanced steam parameters forced a general change to improved
steels in most areas of the boiler, steam piping and turbine.
In
particular, the high main steam pressure and double reheat mean that at
rated load water/steam temperatures in the furnace walls will increase
and in the cyclones, temperatures will be close to 480 C. However, it
is important to note that 13CrMo44 is still applicable for the furnace
walls but to guarantee the safe operation of the furnace walls very
thorough stress analyses were performed of the tubes in the burner zone
at the transitions from spiral wound tubes to vertical tubes and those
parts of the upper pass walls most exposed to heat.
For HP 1 and the final superheater, finely grained austenitic steel
HTP 347 FG was supplied by Sumitomo Steel and for thick-walled headers,
main steam and hot reheat piping new 9% Cr-steel P 91 were supplied by
DB Kraftwerksrohrleitungsbau. The procurement of steam piping indicated
no increases in price due to new P 91 and erection demonstrated that
welding of P 91 is easier than for older 12% Cr steel like X20 CrMoV
121.
Figure 3.
USC Steam Generator (1997)
3.2 Experience
from Commissioning and early Operation
The flue gas cleaning path of gas-fired Sk rb k 3 is much simpler
than for a coal-fired plant and, therefore, it might be expected that
the commissioning would be easier. However, the commissioning of
Skaerbaek 3, in particular, suffered from problems with HP heaters and
turbine valves.
During acid cleaning of the furnace walls and super heaters of
Skaerbaek 3 it was discovered that the conductivity of the feed water
remained high and after many investigations it was concluded that a
layer of phosphate created during production of HP heater tubes still
remained on tube surfaces. The removal of the phosphate was very time
consuming and the HP heater tubes were acid cleaned on the feed water
side until conductivity was approved. On the steam side it was approved
to let the condensate wash the tubes during normal plant operation and
watch the conductivity fall. At Nordjylland 3 both sides of the tubes
were acid cleaned and conductivity could be approved after a short
time.
Pressure areas and spring forces of the intercept valves of the IP
0 turbine had to be modified to ensure the safe closing of the valves.
Also tolerances between moving parts of main and pilot valves were too
small and had to be increased but problems concerning rubbing between
stationary and moving parts still need to be solved. Working fluid for
the hydraulics of the turbine valves has been changed from turbine oil
to phosphate esther with good results. In other major valves and bypass
stations in the boiler area the working fluid will also be changed from
oil to phosphate esther.
During commissioning the generator had to be balanced - can be done
in air - before and after over speed tests. However, the vibration
level was still too high and during plant overhaul in August, new
possibilities for balancing bolts were arranged which have reduced
vibrations to half of the guaranteed figures.
Skaerbaek 3 started commercial operation on October 1, 1997 and
generator output has suffered from an oversized swallowing capacity in
the VHP turbine. This also meant that the first cold reheat temperature
was too high causing too much spray and adding to problems concerning
the overall heat balance of the boiler. During plant overhaul, the
nozzle boxes of the VHP turbine have been modified so the swallowing
capacity now is correct.
The correct combustion of natural gas was more difficult than
expected and in March 1998 burners were modified. During plant overhaul
in August 1998 further burner modifications were done and optimisation
is now ongoing to ensure full reheat temperatures at all loads between
60 and 100% load.
At Skaerbaek 3 the flue gas path is based on singular 100%
components and this principle has demonstrated excellent operating
behaviour so far.
The commissioning of Nordjylland 3 suffered from the same problems
as Skaerbaek 3 but also benefitted from the experiences at Skaerbaek 3
and all in all the commissioning of Nordjylland 3 proceeded without any
major problems. Acid cleaning and steam blowing was done in February
and April 1998 followed by:
|
Steam to turbine:
|
June 1, 1998.
|
|
Start coal-firing:
|
June 10, 1998.
|
|
Synchronisation:
|
June 15, 1998.
|
|
Start commercial operation:
|
September 15, 1998.
|
Typically for the second of the twin plants,
Nordjylland 3 started commercial operation ahead of plan, in this case
two weeks earlier than planned.
Early plant operation of Nordjylland 3 has suffered from the same
problems concerning swallowing capacity of the VHP turbine and boiler
combustion as Skaerbaek 3, and during this year's plant overhaul a
number of modifications as effected at Skaerbaek 3 will be repeated.
4 The
Joint European Demonstration Project.
The presentation of ELSAM during the 1989 VGB Congress in Hamburg
also brought a graph which forecasted that net efficiency of a seawater
cooled, pulverised coal-fired power plant could be raised into the
range of 51% after year 2000 but with main steam temperatures in the
range of 650 C. Today we feel very happy to note that this target seems
possible to reach based on a double reheat cycle with main steam
pressure in the range of 330 bar, main steam temperatures in the range
of 610 C and reheat temperatures some 20K higher. Similar design
parameters are now being used by German utilities for the planning of
new generating capacity.
However, improvements of the coal-fired power plant technology do
not stop at the level mentioned above and, in January 1998 a large
group of major suppliers to the power industry and some of the leading
utilities in Europe started a demonstration project named "Advanced
("700 C") PF Power Plant". The project is being financially supported
by the European Commission's THERMIE programme. The aim of the project
is to break the "steel barrier" and introduce new nickel-based super
alloys for the highest temperatures in the steam cycle which will be in
the range of 700 C, thus boosting the coal-to-wire efficiency into the
range of 52-55% depending on site and fuel conditions. One of the
cycles to be investigated is indicated in figure 4.
The project is technologically very advanced but even if it may
succeed technically, the economy of the project is challenged by other
fuels and technologies and to ensure the success of the whole project
the complete plant structure will be reviewed to find other more cost
effective ways of arranging the major components, i.e. boiler and
turbine. This kind of advanced overall plant architecture has been
called compact design.
Figure 4.
Advanced Steam/Water Cycle of 2010.
The original idea of this project was generated during ELSAM's
R&D programme of the mid 1990's and further promoted through a
joint European programme named COST. Now, 40 partners of which 26 are
industrial companies, counting all leading boiler and turbine
manufacturers, material and steel manufacturers join the project and
the remaining partners are utilities and material test laboratories.
The organisation of the project has called for the formation of three
main groups: a turbine group, a boiler group and a process group. The
turbine group - headed by ALSTOM, Rugby, UK - is responsible for the
materials and design of the turbine; the boiler group - headed by
Babcock Kraftwerkstechnik, Oberhausen, Germany - is subdivided into
three subgroups responsible for boiler design, boiler materials and
combustion; and the process group - headed by ELSAMPROJEKT - is
responsible for the cycle optimization, balance-of-plant, overall
economy, etc. Overall project coordination is in the hands of
ELSAMPROJEKT.
Following a preliminary design and feasibility study in parallel
with initial materials testing, design and testing of large critical
components will have to be performed as well as qualification of all
optimized materials. An overall time schedule for the complete project,
culminating with the construction of the plant somewhere in Europe in
about 8 years, is found in figure 5.
The project proposal covers the first six years of a planned, total
project duration of 17 years. The budget for the activities within
materials testing, preliminary design and feasibility totals approx.
ECU 20 m of which the Commission has been asked for a grant of 40%
under the DGXVII THERMIE programme.
Figure 5. Phases of the USC-700oC
Project
Figure 5 indicates that a second phase of
demonstration programmes
will start in year 2001, which is three years after project start. This
is a very important part of the whole project requiring many hosts and
sponsorship and, hopefully, many other European utilities and
manufacturers than those already joining will show their interest and
join the project.
|
|


|